SexScripts :: View topic

Re: Courtroom	cgut2001 [ Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:52 pm ]
sdslave wrote: Did something happen with the program? Its now telling me I am not validated and there are N/A approved or pending court users. Hi sdslave thats kind of strange. As far as I know this will only happen if your UserID was lost on the client side. The UserID is stored in the data.properties file within the folder structure of sexscripts. The most obvious reason may be if you deleted your installation and started new or if the file was damaged. Another possible reason might be if your account has been banned. This is something that happens very rarely and it never happens without reason.

Re: Courtroom

cgut2001 [ Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:52 pm ]

sdslave wrote:

Did something happen with the program? Its now telling me I am not validated and there are N/A approved or pending court users.

Hi sdslave

thats kind of strange. As far as I know this will only happen if your UserID was lost on the client side. The UserID is stored in the data.properties file within the folder structure of sexscripts.

The most obvious reason may be if you deleted your installation and started new or if the file was damaged.

Another possible reason might be if your account has been banned. This is something that happens very rarely and it never happens without reason.

Re: Courtroom	sdslave [ Sun Dec 29, 2019 2:01 am ]
cgut2001 wrote: sdslave wrote: Did something happen with the program? Its now telling me I am not validated and there are N/A approved or pending court users. Hi sdslave thats kind of strange. As far as I know this will only happen if your UserID was lost on the client side. The UserID is stored in the data.properties file within the folder structure of sexscripts. The most obvious reason may be if you deleted your installation and started new or if the file was damaged. Another possible reason might be if your account has been banned. This is something that happens very rarely and it never happens without reason. Thanks, I found the issue. My user id did change but I am not sure why. I haven't deleted or installed any updates recently.

Re: Courtroom

sdslave [ Sun Dec 29, 2019 2:01 am ]

cgut2001 wrote:

sdslave wrote:

Did something happen with the program? Its now telling me I am not validated and there are N/A approved or pending court users.

Thanks, I found the issue. My user id did change but I am not sure why. I haven't deleted or installed any updates recently.

Re: Courtroom	666 [ Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:01 am ]
sissykim69 wrote: Looks like the download is broken, getting a file not found exception. Hey I'm getting the exact same problem.

Re: Courtroom

666 [ Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:01 am ]

sissykim69 wrote:

Looks like the download is broken, getting a file not found exception.

Hey I'm getting the exact same problem.

A little glitch updating collateral description	RoadR_ [ Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:13 pm ]
After being away for a long time, I had to update my collateral pic. I've choosen the opportunity to take a complete new picture. By doing so, I had also to update the written description for that image. Now, in settings anything is fine, I see the new collateral as well as the description. It got also validated. But after opening a case, in the "Current cases" section, there will be the old collateral description displayed. Of course I can't see, which collateral picture would be published, the old one or the new one, as long as I managed to do my punishment right. This will be up to the jury though Other topic: By thinking about possible changes for courtroom, I had an idea. Since implementing new punishments is quite a workload, how about a "free choice" punishment. The user could choose this and upload any evidence of a punishment as he "likes" it. Servity could be increased by requesting the user to do a set of different punishment tasks and provide evidence. Of course the jury would have to be very strict in deciding if a punishment was sufficent enough. So the user is encouraged to deliver evidence about a really propper punishment with "higher level of "uncomfortness/pain/emparresment" then the existing punishments would offer. (This idea is evoked from the free forfeit option in spinthebottle). Could be interessting to see with what ideas the users will come up to convince the jury that their own punishment is more worse then the original punishments.

A little glitch updating collateral description

RoadR_ [ Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:13 pm ]

After being away for a long time, I had to update my collateral pic. I've choosen the opportunity to take a complete new picture. By doing so, I had also to update the written description for that image.

Now, in settings anything is fine, I see the new collateral as well as the description. It got also validated.

But after opening a case, in the "Current cases" section, there will be the old collateral description displayed. Of course I can't see, which collateral picture would be published, the old one or the new one, as long as I managed to do my punishment right. This will be up to the jury though

Other topic: By thinking about possible changes for courtroom, I had an idea. Since implementing new punishments is quite a workload, how about a "free choice" punishment. The user could choose this and upload any evidence of a punishment as he "likes" it. Servity could be increased by requesting the user to do a set of different punishment tasks and provide evidence.
Of course the jury would have to be very strict in deciding if a punishment was sufficent enough. So the user is encouraged to deliver evidence about a really propper punishment with "higher level of "uncomfortness/pain/emparresment" then the existing punishments would offer. (This idea is evoked from the free forfeit option in spinthebottle).

Could be interessting to see with what ideas the users will come up to convince the jury that their own punishment is more worse then the original punishments.

Re: Courtroom	ptdw [ Wed Jan 15, 2020 6:26 am ]
Hi @RoadR_, I like that idea a lot. I (and I suspect you) have a lot of non-standard "equipment" that would be interesting to put to use in Courtroom, but can't be added as normal punishments since very few people would have the equipment. BTW: Nice job in the electric chair! That looks incredibly painful, not quite sure you manage that.

Re: Courtroom

ptdw [ Wed Jan 15, 2020 6:26 am ]

Hi @RoadR_, I like that idea a lot. I (and I suspect you) have a lot of non-standard "equipment" that would be interesting to put to use in Courtroom, but can't be added as normal punishments since very few people would have the equipment.

BTW: Nice job in the electric chair! That looks incredibly painful, not quite sure you manage that.

Re: Courtroom	RoadR_ [ Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:32 pm ]
Hi PTDW, thank you. I was painful, though it was "only" for 10 seconds. I have the vage apprehension, my next round could be much worse Don't read any further if you will not know about exact punishment details... Show spoiler I'm currently thinking about a rewrite of the electric chair punishment. To be honest, the way it works at the moment, there is a small problem. Since the punishment consist of one long continuous stimulus, the nervs do adjust quite quickly, so the pain will go away after a few seconds. This is a common problem with estim (and save powerlevels). So I'm expermentig right now with new soundfiles to deliver more a set of very quick, powerful impulses for a given time. This way the nerves will have less chance to adjust to the stimulus and it will remain very painfull / stressfull over the whole time. Also the max. possible time you can get is in my opinion much to short to be "the most painful" punishment in courtroom. To receive 30 or more propper canestrokes or to endure the backpain of 50 Minutes in the pillory is in my oppinion much worse. A minute in the electric chair is quickly over. So I'm thinking about something like a set of applied shocks. Like "You are sentenced to receive five sets of 10 shocks each over a timeperiod of 20 minutes." Number of sets and shocks per set dependen on the serverity of course. I know, this would destroy the "real electric chair" experience a little, since in the real deal there would initially also just one strong shock. But in the real deal they don't have to care about safety I, personaly can only speak about my experience with the ET312B box. But, since this unit does reach the maximum safe possible levels, I think the behavior with an 2B box will be the same. Okay, if the signal is generated by the ET312 itself and not via audio, it can be slightly more powerful. This is why I also experiment with different audio wave forms to find the "optimum" for pain. Maybe it will be neccessary to adapt the audio setup in courtroom to be able to differentiate between 2B and ET312 boxes to deliver in both cases the best possible experience. I also thought of implementing something like a "pain slave mode" where the serverity will be dramatically increased. This option switchable of course. I guess, cgut tried to implement something like this with the probation and serial offender programm. Have a nice night!

Re: Courtroom

RoadR_ [ Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:32 pm ]

Hi PTDW,

thank you. I was painful, though it was "only" for 10 seconds. I have the vage apprehension, my next round could be much worse :roll:

Don't read any further if you will not know about exact punishment details...

Show spoiler

I'm currently thinking about a rewrite of the electric chair punishment. To be honest, the way it works at the moment, there is a small problem. Since the punishment consist of one long continuous stimulus, the nervs do adjust quite quickly, so the pain will go away after a few seconds. This is a common problem with estim (and save powerlevels).
So I'm expermentig right now with new soundfiles to deliver more a set of very quick, powerful impulses for a given time. This way the nerves will have less chance to adjust to the stimulus and it will remain very painfull / stressfull over the whole time.
Also the max. possible time you can get is in my opinion much to short to be "the most painful" punishment in courtroom. To receive 30 or more propper canestrokes or to endure the backpain of 50 Minutes in the pillory is in my oppinion much worse. A minute in the electric chair is quickly over. So I'm thinking about something like a set of applied shocks. Like "You are sentenced to receive five sets of 10 shocks each over a timeperiod of 20 minutes." Number of sets and shocks per set dependen on the serverity of course. I know, this would destroy the "real electric chair" experience a little, since in the real deal there would initially also just one strong shock. But in the real deal they don't have to care about safety :lol:

I, personaly can only speak about my experience with the ET312B box. But, since this unit does reach the maximum safe possible levels, I think the behavior with an 2B box will be the same. Okay, if the signal is generated by the ET312 itself and not via audio, it can be slightly more powerful. This is why I also experiment with different audio wave forms to find the "optimum" for pain. Maybe it will be neccessary to adapt the audio setup in courtroom to be able to differentiate between 2B and ET312 boxes to deliver in both cases the best possible experience. I also thought of implementing something like a "pain slave mode" where the serverity will be dramatically increased. This option switchable of course. I guess, cgut tried to implement something like this with the probation and serial offender programm.

Have a nice night!

Re: Courtroom	ptdw [ Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:10 am ]
Hi @ RoadR_, I agree 100%. In fact, the main element I fear about the electric chair is the public humiliation on PornHub. The pain is secondary. If you have a chance to re-write that, it would be great! That is, until I am assigned an electric chair punishment, lol. Thanks for all your contributions and great ideas!

Re: Courtroom

ptdw [ Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:10 am ]

Hi @ RoadR_, I agree 100%. In fact, the main element I fear about the electric chair is the public humiliation on PornHub. The pain is secondary. If you have a chance to re-write that, it would be great! That is, until I am assigned an electric chair punishment, lol. Thanks for all your contributions and great ideas!

Re: Courtroom	NIFOC99 [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:14 pm ]
Rewriting the electric chair shock procedures is a good idea. I have used a variety of sound flies with Hurrah for School and BuzzQuiz. The idea was to keep players guessing. They were developed for the Abox, but should be OK for all audio power boxes in that range. The sounds range in pain and sensation; some of them are quite gentle. It should be easy to program: Code: def T1 = new Date().getTime() def T2 = T1+punishTime //punishment time in ms while (T1<T2) { playSound(soundFiles[getRandom(soundFiles.size)]) T1 = new Date().getTime() } I also tried to add unpredictability to non-audio shocks in BuzzQuiz. There is also a persistent issue with the choice of estim device. It affects Courtroom, The White Queen and possibly any other script that reuses code from Strip or Die. This is what I contributed to The White Queen forum some time ago. Quote: The issue is in 'strip or die.' It uses two saved values stripordie.audio_estim and stripordie.no_estim. It tests if audio_estim is null, and if so sets audio_estim to true and saves the result. This should happen the first time the script is run, and is fine as it can be changed during the set up. It does the same for no_estim, but instead of saving a value for no_estim, it saves audio_estim as false. Again, this can always be changed during set up, but the value of no_estim is never saved. Every time the script runs, it is null, and audio_estim is set to false. I think the result is that if you run 'strip or die' without going through the set up, it defaults to non-audio estim device. audio_estim is false and no_estim is null. The script uses !no_estim to test for non-audio estim (!null = true), which means it tries to find the file usbcontrol.exe to control it, even if you have an audio estim or no estim. If you go through the set up process, it all works, but because the corrected value for no_estim is not saved, you have to do it every time. The question for 'the white queen' is should it follow 'strip or die' or should 'strip or die' be made more logical? There is no set up for estim in 'the white queen.' In any case, I think a script should test that a file exists before using it, either directly or using the groovy try-catch method. I have found working with files in sexscripts needs careful error trapping!

Re: Courtroom

NIFOC99 [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:14 pm ]

Rewriting the electric chair shock procedures is a good idea. I have used a variety of sound flies with Hurrah for School and BuzzQuiz. The idea was to keep players guessing. They were developed for the Abox, but should be OK for all audio power boxes in that range. The sounds range in pain and sensation; some of them are quite gentle. It should be easy to program:

Code:

def T1 = new Date().getTime()
def T2 = T1+punishTime //punishment time in ms
while (T1<T2) {
playSound(soundFiles[getRandom(soundFiles.size)])
T1 = new Date().getTime()
}

I also tried to add unpredictability to non-audio shocks in BuzzQuiz.

There is also a persistent issue with the choice of estim device. It affects Courtroom, The White Queen and possibly any other script that reuses code from Strip or Die. This is what I contributed to The White Queen forum some time ago.

Quote:

The issue is in 'strip or die.' It uses two saved values stripordie.audio_estim and stripordie.no_estim. It tests if audio_estim is null, and if so sets audio_estim to true and saves the result. This should happen the first time the script is run, and is fine as it can be changed during the set up. It does the same for no_estim, but instead of saving a value for no_estim, it saves audio_estim as false. Again, this can always be changed during set up, but the value of no_estim is never saved. Every time the script runs, it is null, and audio_estim is set to false.
I think the result is that if you run 'strip or die' without going through the set up, it defaults to non-audio estim device. audio_estim is false and no_estim is null. The script uses !no_estim to test for non-audio estim (!null = true), which means it tries to find the file usbcontrol.exe to control it, even if you have an audio estim or no estim.
If you go through the set up process, it all works, but because the corrected value for no_estim is not saved, you have to do it every time.
The question for 'the white queen' is should it follow 'strip or die' or should 'strip or die' be made more logical? There is no set up for estim in 'the white queen.' In any case, I think a script should test that a file exists before using it, either directly or using the groovy try-catch method. I have found working with files in sexscripts needs careful error trapping!

Re: Courtroom	alexbal1984x [ Sun Jan 26, 2020 9:25 pm ]
I am getting an error message, can someone help? I am getting a server error before I get a sentence: Server Error Something went wrong uploading your data to the court. Please report with the following information Trace: UserID 1S128765 Script version v1.36 Server message: Server String: https\://play-link.com/courtroom.php?id\=1S128765&addname\=Alexander&version\=v1.36&crime_name\=Infidelity&crime_detail\=multiple+cheating+on+gf&collateral\=Server-Keep&c_detail\=H178813&punishment\=24+seconds+in+the+electric+chair&deadline\=24&p_detail\=ass&

Re: Courtroom

alexbal1984x [ Sun Jan 26, 2020 9:25 pm ]

I am getting an error message, can someone help?

I am getting a server error before I get a sentence:

Server Error

Something went wrong uploading your data to the court. Please report with the following information

Trace: UserID 1S128765 Script version v1.36

Server message:

Server String:
https\://play-link.com/courtroom.php?id\=1S128765&addname\=Alexander&version\=v1.36&crime_name\=Infidelity&crime_detail\=multiple+cheating+on+gf&collateral\=Server-Keep&c_detail\=H178813&punishment\=24+seconds+in+the+electric+chair&deadline\=24&p_detail\=ass&

Re: Courtroom	cgut2001 [ Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:48 am ]
Hi alexbal1984x not long ago there were quite a lot of complaints about users spamming courtroom. Most of the filed a lot of cases and never posted any evidence for a punishment. The script is courtroom and not expose-o-matic so these users were banned. Judging from your nickname I guess you may have been one of these. If you think this was not correct, you may send a private message to Liz and ask her to unblock your account. regards cgut2001

Re: Courtroom

cgut2001 [ Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:48 am ]

Hi alexbal1984x

not long ago there were quite a lot of complaints about users spamming courtroom. Most of the filed a lot of cases and never posted any evidence for a punishment.

The script is courtroom and not expose-o-matic so these users were banned. Judging from your nickname I guess you may have been one of these.

If you think this was not correct, you may send a private message to Liz and ask her to unblock your account.

regards

cgut2001

Re: Courtroom	israelslave [ Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:50 pm ]
where does the collateral end up online if one gets exposed?

Re: Courtroom

israelslave [ Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:50 pm ]

where does the collateral end up online if one gets exposed?

Re: Courtroom	ptdw [ Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:25 am ]
israelslave wrote: where does the collateral end up online if one gets exposed? Only in the game itself. You can view the judgements to see recently exposed players (if any).

Re: Courtroom

ptdw [ Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:25 am ]

israelslave wrote:

where does the collateral end up online if one gets exposed?

Only in the game itself. You can view the judgements to see recently exposed players (if any).

Re: Courtroom	im_pip [ Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:54 am ]
Hi! I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this so, please excuse me. So I'm just a little confused about the order of things with my trial; I was sentenced to some time in chastity, and submitted evidence that I had locked up, and moved on. But now that I look at my status it says the trial is coming up and no more evidence can be submitted. So, how would I submit the evidence that I was still locked at the end of the period? Sorry if that's a really dumb and obvious question, but if it was explained I apparently missed it. Thanks for any insight

Re: Courtroom

im_pip [ Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:54 am ]

Hi! I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this so, please excuse me.

So I'm just a little confused about the order of things with my trial; I was sentenced to some time in chastity, and submitted evidence that I had locked up, and moved on. But now that I look at my status it says the trial is coming up and no more evidence can be submitted. So, how would I submit the evidence that I was still locked at the end of the period?

Sorry if that's a really dumb and obvious question, but if it was explained I apparently missed it.

Thanks for any insight

Re: Courtroom	ptdw [ Fri May 01, 2020 9:43 pm ]
Hi @im_pip, Courtroom was designed to guarantee you do the task assigned. So simply submitting one picture of being locked up isn't enough to show you were locked up for the correct duration. The instructions for all the tasks are very clear and tell you what is required. Make sure you read them carefully! I've never seen anyone found guilty that followed the instructions exactly. For the chastity task, you submit a pic with the serialized tag, to lock in your start time, and then you come back after your end time showing the serialized tag is still attached. In any case, the case I'm guessing was yours was deleted shortly after you posed this, since it was obvious you were confused about the process. Hope this helps!

Re: Courtroom

ptdw [ Fri May 01, 2020 9:43 pm ]

Hi @im_pip, Courtroom was designed to guarantee you do the task assigned. So simply submitting one picture of being locked up isn't enough to show you were locked up for the correct duration. The instructions for all the tasks are very clear and tell you what is required. Make sure you read them carefully!

I've never seen anyone found guilty that followed the instructions exactly. For the chastity task, you submit a pic with the serialized tag, to lock in your start time, and then you come back after your end time showing the serialized tag is still attached.

In any case, the case I'm guessing was yours was deleted shortly after you posed this, since it was obvious you were confused about the process. Hope this helps!

Re: Courtroom	Indiapers [ Sun May 17, 2020 6:08 am ]
A bit of feedback on Electric Chair routine. You are offered the chance to test the eStim power output at a certain stage. That's obviously a very good idea. The problem is the method (pads or penis, etc) is only declared after testing. So you really don't know what you should be using when you do the test. Reversing these stages might be better? You will be using X , Test, Ouch! Instead of current setup, Let me also say thank you so much for all the effort it has taken to put this together and maintain it.

Re: Courtroom

Indiapers [ Sun May 17, 2020 6:08 am ]

A bit of feedback on Electric Chair routine.

You are offered the chance to test the eStim power output at a certain stage. That's obviously a very good idea.

The problem is the method (pads or penis, etc) is only declared after testing. So you really don't know what you should be using when you do the test. Reversing these stages might be better? You will be using X , Test, Ouch! Instead of current setup,

Let me also say thank you so much for all the effort it has taken to put this together and maintain it.


SexScripts : Courtroom - https://ss.deviatenow.com:443/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=650	Page 25 of 28