| SexScripts : Problem with waitWithGauge - https://ss.deviatenow.com:443/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1023 | Page 1 of 1 |
Problem with waitWithGauge |
ispank [ Mon Jan 25, 2021 2:12 am ] |
|---|---|
Has anyone noticed a problem with Code: waitWithGauge() ?If so, is this a new thing or has it existed for a while? I was testing a new script and noticed that the wait time on one of the tasks seemed long. So I ran it again and timed it, sure enough it took Code: waitWithGauge(40) took 47 seconds to complete. So then I wrote a little test procedure and Code: waitWithGauge(60) takes anywhere from 69 to 72 seconds to complete.Can someone run this on their machine and let me know if you are seeing the same results? Code: def timeTest = { def startTime = 0 def endTime = 0 def totalTime = 0 showButton("Start - 60 second test") startTime = getTime() waitWithGauge(60) endTime = getTime() totalTime = endTime - startTime show(totalTime) showButton("Okay") } FYI, I tried the same with a Code: wait(60) and it returned 60 each time.
|
|
Re: Problem with waitWithGauge |
SomeGuy22006 [ Mon Jan 25, 2021 11:18 am ] |
|---|---|
I was curious about this issue. I ran your test code, modified to repeatedly try times between 5 to 100 seconds and doing it multiple times. I found they always came back too long. It was quite consistent for multiple tries, usually within a second on each attempt. It is not a constant offset so not caused by overheads in initialising the code. I found it took 19-23% longer than asked for. Doesn't get noticeably better or worse for longer/shorter times. |
|
Re: Problem with waitWithGauge |
doti [ Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:40 pm ] |
|---|---|
Interesting. Some overhead was expected, but not so much (on my main platform, 0.1%). A better algorithm can be included in the next release. On which system do you get so much time ? |
|
Re: Problem with waitWithGauge |
ispank [ Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:50 am ] |
|---|---|
I'm running Win10 Home. I'm seeing 16 - 20% on my system. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ] |