doti wrote:
1) It was a bug, corrected
2) Publication being really anonymous, there's no deletion apart manual one (i.e. asking for it)
3) I understand, when using the "resources" flag, the list will be limited then
When a script is detected as an update, the old one is kept a few monthes
The .zip file is named after the .groovy file (as other metadata, this is updated when "checking" or running the script).
Thanks for the answers! 2 is the only one I find unsatisfactory; I still think we need to be able to control/delete our own scripts (not other people's, of course!); it's the only way I'd feel secure uploading more to the site list rather than just providing my own download link that I can control.
More importantly, though, I think we need to have a "downloads" counter beside each script; I for one really want to know how any people are downloading and using my scripts. Sure, it shows "votes", but experience has taught us CM users that the number of people who download vs the number of people who rate (let alone comment) that script is very disproportionate.
For example, I thought nobody used my "alternate setup" until I checked my download counter (since it's my own link, I can track how many downloads it gets) and saw it was over 300, surprising me. If I'd known, I'd have done more work on it!
Finally... using the .groovy name is fine but wouldn't it be better if uploaded scripts used the "Script Title" metadata instead?
Great to hear only Resources list items will be used, though; that one really confused me!